RECPDCL Invites Bids for 223 MW ISTS-Connected Solar Projects

Clean Energy Tech Firm Ecozen Raises $30 Million for Global Expansion

SJVN Green Energy Invites Bids to Source Land for 200 MW Solar Projects in Assam

Avaada Inks ₹45 Billion Refinancing Deal for Four Solar Projects in Rajasthan

Daily News Wrap-Up: Application Process for ALMM Inclusion and Renewal

Australia Adds 5.9 GW of Renewable Capacity to the Grid in 2023

POWERGRID Wins Contracts to Evacuate 18 GW of Renewable Energy

MNRE Seeks Feedback on Guidelines for PM-Surya Ghar Rooftop Solar Program

Apple Partners with CleanMax to Power India Operations with Renewable Energy

Explainer: Application Process for ALMM Inclusion and Renewal

<p>Recently, a petition filed by the Indian Wind Power Association (IWPA) had challenged the validity of the deviation settlement mechanism (DSM) regulations passed by the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (RERC) and requested it to be scrapped.</p>
<p>The members of IWPA had pleaded that the DSM charges were high and that they were major sufferers due to unscheduled power cuts, refusal to offtake power by the state power distribution companies (DISCOMs) despite good generation during peak hours.</p>
<p>The other point of contention raised by the petitioners was that they were liable to pay high settlement charges and that the QCAs (Qualified coordinating agencies), which are responsible for coordinating between generators and state load despatch centers, lacked adequate technical expertise and that the selection of QCAs was forced on them.</p>
<p>The Rajasthan High Court reviewed the petition and has now found that the regulations were valid. In its order, the bench said:</p>
<p><em>“In our considered opinion, the requirement of wind energy generators to provide a week ahead or a day ahead scheduling is well within the powers of RERC to regulate the forecasting, scheduling, and generation of the electricity. Merely because precise forecasting is not possible or feasible as alleged by the petitioners, the provisions requiring such scheduling cannot be held as arbitrary. Similarly, the imposition of deviation charges by Regulation 18 in the event of failure to adhere to the scheduled generation can also not be declared arbitrary.”</em></p>
<p><em>“We are of the firm view that, whatever may be the source of generating the power, the principle as far as power to levy charges or fine by whatever name called on account of deviation is concerned, they have been settled and shall remain unaltered.”</em></p>
<p>As far as the QCAs are concerned, the respondents (RERC and DISCOMs) argued that the petitioners did not have any substantiating evidence in the matter. Also, they did not allow QCAs to be a part of the petition, and therefore, the QCAs could not defend themselves.</p>
<p>The high court accepted that a significant amount of technical expertise would be necessary to evaluate the finer points of the regulation. The court recommended that the petitioners should approach the RERC with their grievances, (including those which have been raised in the petition) for their redressal. The petitioners have been asked to file their petition within a period of 15 days. The court has asked the state load despatch center to refrain from recovering DSM charges until then.</p>
<p>The RERC had issued <a href="https://mercomindia.com/rajasthan-amendment-deviation-settlement-power/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">draft amendments</a> to the 2017 regulations on deviation settlement mechanism for grid-connected power in January 2019.</p>
<p>Recently, the <a href="http://rerc.rajasthan.gov.in/main.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">RERC</a> dismissed petitions filed by captive solar project developers seeking relief from applicable wheeling and banking charges. In its order, the <a href="https://mercomindia.com/rajasthan-amendment-deviation-settlement-power/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">commission clarified</a> whether wheeling charges should be levied on the capacity contracted or the energy wheeled.</p>
<p><a href="https://mercomindia.com/discoms-should-buy-power-re-projects-rec-2-67/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">In October 2018</a>, the commission had released a staff paper on projects registered under renewable energy certificate (REC) mechanism in the state. It had proposed that DISCOMs should purchase the renewable power generated from such projects at the lowest pooled cost notified by the RERC since 2010, that is ₹2.67 (~$0.035)/kWh.</p>
<div class="saboxplugin-wrap" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope itemprop="author"><div class="saboxplugin-tab"><div class="saboxplugin-gravatar"></div><div class="saboxplugin-authorname"><a href="https://cms.mercomindia.com/author/shaurya-bajaj/" class="vcard author" rel="author"><span class="fn">shaurya</span></a></div><div class="saboxplugin-desc"><div itemprop="description"><p><span style="font-family: Calibri"><span style="color: #000000"><span>Shaurya is a staff reporter at MercomIndia.com with experience working in the Indian solar energy industry for the past four years in various roles. Prior to joining Mercom, Shaurya worked with a renewable energy developer and a consulting company. Shaurya holds a Bachelors Degree in Business Management from Lancaster University in the United Kingdom. </span></span></span></p>
</div></div><div class="clearfix"></div></div></div>

Court Upholds Deviation Settlement Mechanism Order Passed by Rajasthan Commission

judgement

Get the most relevant India solar and clean energy news.

RECENT POSTS